ISSN 0798 1015

logo

Vol. 39 (Nº31) Year 2018. Page 10

Methodological characteristics for the efficient evaluation of investments in updating the technical basis of agricultural organizations dedicated to planting

Características metodológicas para la evaluación eficiente de inversiones en la actualización de la base técnica de las organizaciones agrícolas dedicadas a la siembra

Sergey M. REZNICHENKO 1; Yuriy I. BERSHITSKIY 2; Rustem A. SHICHIYAKH 3; Sergej A. KURNOSOV 4; Oksana V. KUZMENKO 5

Received: 18/03/2018 • Approved: 24/04/2018


Contents

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

3. Discussion

4. Conclusions

Bibliographic references


ABSTRACT:

Low technological level of domestic agricultural producers, reducing the supply of machinery to the village, increasing the load on the unit base mechanization does not allow to increase productivity in crop production, to reduce costs of implementation of mechanized operations, etc. In the course of research the method of estimation of economic efficiency of innovation and investment projects on updating and development of technical base of crop production of agricultural producers is specified.
Keywords: Crop production, technical and technological base, renewal, investment

RESUMEN:

El bajo nivel tecnológico de los productores agrícolas rusos, sumado a la reducción en el suministro de maquinarias al pueblo y aumentando la carga en la mecanización de la base de la unidad no permite aumentar la productividad en la producción de cultivos ni reducir los costos de implementación de operaciones mecanizadas. En el transcurso de esta investigación se utilizó el método de la estimación de la eficiencia económica de innovación y los proyectos de inversiones sobre la actualización y el desarrollo de la base técnica de la producción de cultivos de los productores agrícolas.
Palabras clave: producción de cultivos, base técnica y tecnológica, renovación, inversión

1. Introduction

Machine-tractor fleet of agricultural producers is an important element of their production potential. Insufficient availability of tractors, combines and other machinery, high degree of their physical and moral wear and tear lead to violation of agricultural technologies of cultivation and, as a consequence, to large losses of crop and income. Therefore, timely updating and replenishment of the fleet of machines taking into account the development of modern innovative resource-saving mechanized technologies is a prerequisite for improving the efficiency of crop production, increasing the volume and competitiveness of products.

Well-known scientific publications of this research area reveal the main theoretical and methodological provisions of the problem under consideration. However, some of its aspects require further deepening, development and adaptation to constantly changing internal and external technical, technological and organizational and economic conditions of agricultural production.

The aim of this work was to clarify and develop methodological provisions for assessing the effectiveness of investments in the renewal of the machine and tractor fleet of agricultural organizations, taking into account the transition to innovative mechanized technologies in crop production. The achievement of this goal involved the development of an assessment methodology, as well as its testing on the example of agricultural organizations in one of the regions of the South of Russia.

2. Materials and methods

The research was carried out using the methods of comparative analysis, monographic, economic-statistical and computational-analytical.

3. Discussion

Proceeding from economic essence of reproduction process, reproduction of technical base of plant growing should be understood as process of constant renewal of quantity, quality, structure of the machine and tractor Park exposed to physical and moral wear for the purpose of preservation or increase of volumes of production of agricultural products at increase of productivity of work and decrease in specific production costs. At the same time, the reproduction process can be carried out in two ways: by major repairs of worn-out machines and their further use, or by replacing the old equipment with a new one. In the latter case, the reproduction process is innovative, since the updating of technology, as a rule, occurs with the simultaneous improvement of its composition and quality through the introduction of technical and technological innovations.

The analysis showed that the quantitative composition of basic mechanization in agricultural organizations in Russia has decreased significantly over the past two and a half decades (Figure 1). Among the main reasons for this is the weakening of state support for the agricultural sector, the nonequivalence of cross-sectoral exchange, high price and low availability of debt capital. 

Figure 1
Availability of basic means of mechanization of plant
growing in agricultural organizations of Russia

Source: Prepared by the authors.

Violation of the reproduction processes of the technical base of producers caused an increase in the load per unit of basic mechanization, which only over the past 6-7 years increased by almost 30% (Table 1). In the existing Park of agricultural machinery of Russia 60% of tractors and 45% of combine harvesters are operated for more than 10 years (Bershitsky, 2014). This is one of the causes of significant crop losses, and, as a consequence, a decrease in the efficiency of crop production.

In the current conditions, the issues of technical re-equipment of the crop sector with the transition to modern resource-saving agricultural technologies are of particular importance.

The introduction of technical and technological innovations in production requires significant investment, so it is important to correctly assess their effectiveness and riskiness.

Table 1
Indicators of technical equipment of plant growing industry of the Russian Federation.

Years

Availability of equipment

Load per unit of agricultural machinery, hectares

we have 1000 hectares of arable land tractors, pcs.

there are 1000 hectares of crops of grain combine harvesters, pcs.

On the tractor

On the combine harvester

2010

4,2

3,1

236

327

2011

4,1

2,8

247

354

2012

3,9

2,7

258

369

2013

3,6

2,5

274

399

2014

3,5

2,4

290

408

2015

3,3

2,4

307

422

2016

3,3

2,4

305

425

Source: Prepared by the authors.

As indicators of efficiency of investments are most often used are dynamic indicators, such as net present value, internal rate of return and discounted payback period (Chetyrkin, 1998). However, the methodology for calculating these indicators should be adapted to the characteristics of the subject area under consideration. In assessing the effectiveness of investments, it is necessary to take into account the structure of the invested capital and the price of its various sources (Kuzmenko, 2014), as well as the price dynamics in calculating the expected cash flows generated by the project.

Given the above, the net present value of the innovative-investment project of the renovation of the technical base of plant producers is to be calculated using the following expression:

Negative cash flows in this expression represent investment costs of the producer for acquisition of new equipment. These costs can be of a one-time nature (for the conditions of self-financing of investments) and distributed over time (using borrowed financial resources). In the latter case, formula (1) takes into account the possibility of debt repayment with deferred payment, advance payment and increased payment in the first years of the project:

At the same time, the economic effect of the transition to new agricultural technologies consists of saving operating costs for field mechanized work and the cost of additional products obtained through the use of new technology.

The reduction of operating costs in the transition to new technologies is achieved through the use of multi-operational combined machines and tools, increasing the productivity of new equipment and reducing the cost of maintaining it in working order.

The economic effect of saving operating costs due to the introduction of sectoral technical and technological innovations can be calculated using the following formula:

Another component of the economic effect is formed by reducing crop losses due to the possibility of performing the most important field mechanized work in the optimal agrotechnical terms, as well as by increasing the yield of crops due to the transition to innovative technologies for their cultivation and harvesting.

The General economic effect of the production of additional products due to the improvement of the technical and technological base of crop production can be calculated using the following expression:

The first component of this effect represents an additional income of the company resulting from the formation of the optimal composition of the tractor fleet, which allows to reduce the time of performing the essential field work to the recommended. For each type of technological operation, this economic effect in formalized form can be represented by the following expression:

The second component of the economic effect obtained from the growth of crop yields due to the transition to innovative agricultural technologies can be determined by the formula:

The technique described above was tested on the example of agricultural organizations in the South of the Rostov region. Agro-climatic and soil features of this zone are characterized by insufficient and unstable moisture, which requires the use of innovative water-saving technologies of tillage, implemented zonal system of machines adapted to the conditions of the zone placement. This requires an appropriate update of the composition of the machine and tractor fleet of agricultural organizations of the zone.

Using as initial data the developed structure of the sown areas of the agricultural organizations of the zone, characteristics of innovative agrotechnologies and average for a number of the last years of productivity of the main crops, calculations on determination of optimum structure of machine and tractor Park of agricultural producers of the investigated zone by means of the author's mathematical model (Bershitsky, 2010) and the computer programs developed for its practical implementation were executed (Bershitsky, Katsko & Kastidi, 2012; Bershitsky, Katsko & Krepyshev, 2012; Bershitsky & Kastidi, 2012). The lack of means of mechanization of producers, as well as the amount of necessary investment to eliminate it was determined by the results of a comparative analysis of the optimal and available (at the beginning of 2016). the composition of the machine and tractor fleet (Table 2). Taking into account the high degree of wear and tear of equipment, in the process of updating the machine and tractor fleet, the possibility of selling worn-out equipment at a liquidation cost of 5% of the original carrying price was taken into account.

Table 2
Indicators of renewal of machine and tractor Park of producers of the South of
the Rostov region taking into account transition to innovative agrotechnologies.

Type of equipment

Presence, pcs.

Acquisition

total

beyond the amortization term

quantity, pcs

cost, million rubles

liquidation value of worn-out equipment, million rubles

Tractors

18564

10893

5813

4818

424

Combine harvester

4916

2494

2992

14641

262

Truck

7531

3546

215

387

319

Multi-operational tillage machines and tools

-

-

2600

1087

-

Total

31011

16933

11620

20933

1005

Required investments, million rubles

19928

Source: Prepared by the authors.

Calculations have shown that technical re-equipment of crop production of producers of the considered zone will require about 20 billion rubles of investments

In table 3 calculated indicators of economic effect from updating of machine and tractor Park of producers of the considered zone at the expense of reduction of operational expenses with application of an author's technique are resulted.

Table 3
Calculated indicators of the economic effect of the renewal of the machine
and tractor fleet of producers of the South of the Rostov region.

Indicators

Existing technology

Innovative technology

Effect

Tractors are required, thousand pieces

12,6

12,2

0,4

Agricultural machineries are required, thousand pieces

102,3

74,7

27,6

Cost of the fleet, million rubles

51727

49654

2073

Machine operators are required, people

9100

8500

600

Operating costs, million rubles

16516

15442

1074

Source: Prepared by the authors.

 

The calculations also showed that the transition to innovative technologies of soil treatment and reduction of duration of the grain harvest will allow you to get more crop production in the amount of 4.2 billion rubles.

In total, as a result of technical and technological modernization of crop production, producers of the considered zone can get an annual economic effect in the amount of 5.3 billion rubles.

Table 4 shows the estimated performance of investments in the implementation of this innovative project.

Tables 4
Calculated indicators of economic efficiency of investments in technical and technological
modernization of crop production in the South of the Rostov region.

Indicator

Value

Investment costs, million rubles

19928

Expected annual economic effect, million rubles

6646

Discount rate, %

13,3

Net present value, million rubles

8,2

Internal rate of return, %

26,7

Discounted payback period, years

5,0

Source: Prepared by the authors.

The positive value of net discounted income and short payback period of investments indicate the economic feasibility of the project implementation of technical and technological innovations in crop production in the South of the Rostov region.

The effectiveness of the introduction of sectoral innovations largely depends on the financial conditions of their implementation, including the solvency of producers, which determines the possibility of their self-financing, as well as the conditions for attracting external financial resources.

Calculations have shown that the most effective way to Finance innovative projects to update the technical and technological base of rural organizations are currently the conditions of Federal leasing, allowing agricultural producers to carry out technical re-equipment of production without large capital costs.

When using Bank loans as a source of financing for innovation and investment projects, state support in the form of subsidizing part of their interest rate is necessary.

4. Conclusions

The conducted researches allow to draw the following main conclusions:

1. The volume of investments in updating the technical base of crop production of agricultural organizations should be determined by the results of a comparative analysis of the existing and optimal composition of the machine and tractor fleet. At the same time, the optimal composition should be formed taking into account the transition to modern resource-saving mechanized technologies of cultivation of crops.

2. When calculating the performance indicators of investments in technical re-equipment of agricultural producers, it is proposed to use the author's methodology that allows for taking into account the sources and price of invested capital, as well as methods of repayment of financial debt. The technique also allows to calculate the expected economic effect from the renewal of the machine and tractor fleet, formed by reducing the cost of mechanized work in the field, as well as by increasing the volume of products from reducing the duration of these works and improve their quality.

3. The developed technique was tested in assessing the effectiveness of updating the technical base of crop farming organizations of the South of the Rostov region. The calculations made allowed to substantiate the recommended optimal composition of the machine and tractor fleet of manufacturers, to calculate the volume of required investments in the amount of 20 billion rubles, to determine the indicators of their efficiency. Proven economic feasibility of implementing this innovative-investment project, internal rate of return which is equal to 26.7% and the discounted payback period shall not exceed 5 years.

4. As a result of researches it is established that the most effective form of financing of investment projects of renewal of technical base of agricultural producers now is the financial leasing allowing to carry out modernization of production on the innovative basis without attraction of large investments.

Bibliographic references

Bershitsky, Y.I. (2010). Mathematical model of mixed integer programming to determine the optimal needs of the agricultural machinery producers. Proceedings of Kuban State Agrarian UNIVERSITY, 27, 7-11.

Bershitsky, Yu. I. (2014). Economics of formation and reproduction of technical base of crop production of agricultural organizations: monograph. Krasnodar: Education-South.

Bershitsky, Y.I. Katsko, I.A. & Kastidi, Y.K. (2012). The formation of the composition and calculation of the performance of alternative machine-tractor units on the implementation of mechanized operations in the system of adapted agricultural technologies: the certificate of state registration of computer programs. Krasnodar: Kuban State Agrarian University (RU). - №2012619421; Application №2012617396 from 03.10.12; registered 18.10.2012.

Bershitsky, Y.I. Katsko, I.A. & Krepyshev, D.A. (2012). Adaptive design of mechanized technologies of tillage: certificate of state registration of computer programs. Krasnodar: Kuban State Agrarian University (RU). No 2012619024; application No. 2012616871 from 14.08.2012; was 05.10.2012.

Bershitsky, Y.I. & Kastidi, Y.K. (2012). The formation of tabular and graphic results of computer design, ICC agricultural enterprises: certificate of state registration of computer programs. Krasnodar: Kuban State Agrarian University (RU). - №2012619980; application № 2012617395 from 03.09.12; registered 02.11.2012.

Chetyrkin, E. M. (1998). Financial analysis of production investments. Moscow: Buisness.

Kuzmenko, O.V. (2014). On the issue of valuation of capital invested in the reproduction of agricultural machinery. International Scientific Journal, 2, 27-33.


1. Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, Krasnodar, Russia

2. Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, Krasnodar, Russia

3. Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, Krasnodar, Russia, E-mail: shichiyax.r@kubsau.ru

4. Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, Krasnodar, Russia

5. Azov-Black Sea Engineering Institute Don State Agrarian University, Zernograd, Russia


Revista ESPACIOS. ISSN 0798 1015
Vol. 39 (Nº 31) Year 2018

[Índice]

[In case you find any errors on this site, please send e-mail to webmaster]

revistaESPACIOS.com