ISSN-L: 0798-1015   •   eISSN: 2739-0071 (En línea)


logo


Vol. 42 (Nº 16) Año 2021. Art. 4

Recibido: 24/06/2021 • Aprobado: 09/07/2021 • Publicado 30/08/2021
DOI: 10.48082/espacios-a21v42n16p04

A new flexible benchmarking monitoring system: a case study for the civil construction sector in Brazil 

Un nuevo sistema flexible de monitoreo de evaluación comparativa: un estudio de caso para el sector de la construcción civil en Brasil 

ALBERTIN, Marcos R. 1
PONTES, Heráclito L. J. 2
ARAGÃO JUNIOR, Dmontier P. 3
PRATA, Bruno A. 4
BALTAZAR, Marcos C.P. 5

Abstract
This paper aims at presenting a new flexible benchmarking model in civil construction. It describes an explanatory case study whereby data are collected through an internet benchmarking system with multi-criteria performance. This case study was based on the Production Arrangements Monitoring and Benchmarking System (SIMAP), the authors describe a flexible benchmarking model considering 46 criteria classified into 7 subsystems. The proposed benchmarking system can be used by companies from other countries with proper adaptations.
Key words: multi-criteria performance, civil construction supply chain, decision analysis

Resumen
Este artículo tiene como objetivo presentar un modelo nuevo de benchmarking flexible en la construcción civil. Describe un estudio de caso explicativo en el que se recopilan los datos por el internet a través de un sistema de benchmarking con un rendimiento de criterios múltiples, basado en el Sistema de Monitoreo y Benchmarking de Arreglos de Producción (SIMAP) considerando 46 criterios clasificados en 7 subsistemas. Este procedimiento puede ser utilizado por empresas de otros países con las adaptaciones adecuadas.
Palabras clave: Desempeño de criterios múltiples, cadena de suministro de construcción civil, análisis de decisiones

 

VERSIÓN COMPLETA

PDF HTML

 

References

Albertin, M. R., Pontes, H. L. J., Frazzon, E. M., & Frota, E. R. (2014). Industrial performance assessment through the application of a benchmarking and monitoring system. In: 4th International Conference on Dynamics in Logistics.

Albertin, M. R., Pontes, H. L. J., Frazzon, E. M., & Frota, E. R. (2016). Industrial Performance Assessment through the Application of a Benchmarking and Monitoring System. In Dynamics in Logistics (pp. 643-653). Springer, Cham.

Albertin, M.R., Pontes, H. L. J., Frota, E. R., & Assunção, M. B. (2015) Flexible benchmarking: a new reference model. Benchmark. Int. J., v. 22 (5), 920-944.

Abbasian-Hosseini, S. A., Hsiang, S. M., Leming, M. L., & Liu, M. (2014). From Social Network to Data Envelopment Analysis: Identifying Benchmarks at the Site Management Level. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 140(8), 1-10.

Ahuja, V., Yang, J., & Shankar, R. (2010). Benchmarking Framework to Measure Extent of ICT Adoption for Building Project Management. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(5), 538-545.

Beatham, S., Anumba, C., Thorpe, T., & Hedges, I. (2004). KPIs: A critical appraisal of their use in construction. Benchmark. Int. J., 11(1), 93–117.

Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, A. P. L. (2004). Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmark. Int. J., 11(2), 203–221.

Chin, S. Y., Pontes, H. L. J., & Porto, A. L. V. (2005) Retrieving process analysis in a parts distribution center: a case study of manual trolley fleet substitution. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2005.

Costa, D. B., Formoso, C. T., Kagioglou, M., Alarcón, L. F., & Caldas, C. H. (2006). Benchmarking initiatives in the construction industry: Lessons learned and improvement opportunities. J. Manage. Eng.,22(4), 158–167.

Cox, R. F., Issa, R. R. A., & Ahrens, D. (2003). Management’s perception of key performance indicators for construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(2), 142–151.

El-Mashaleh, M. S., Minchin, R. E., & O’Brien, W. J. (2007). Management of construction firm performance using benchmarking. J. Manage. Eng., 23(1), 10–17.

Fang, D. P., Huang, X. Y., & Hinze, J. (2004) Benchmarking Studies on Construction Safety Management in China. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(3), 424-432.

Johnson, A., Chen, W. C., & Mcginnis, L. F. (2010) Large-scale Internet benchmarking: Technology and application in warehousing operations. Computers in Industry [S.I.], v. 61, n. 3, p. 280-286.

Johnson, W. H. (2008) Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: The case of Precarn. Technovation, 28, 495–505.

Lee, S. H., Thomas, S. R., & Tucker, R. L. (2005) Web-Based Benchmarking System for the Construction Industry. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(7), 790-798.

Lima, R. S., Albertin, M. R., Loos, M. J., & Vital, T. (2017). Análise de compras por pregão eletrônico na modalidade licitatória em uma empresa do setor de distribuição energética. Espacios (Caracas) (38), 10 – 22.

Park, H. S., Thomas, S.R., & Tucker, R.L. (2005) Benchmarking of Construction Productivity. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(7), 772-778.

Ramirez, R. R, Alarcón, L. F. C., & Knights, P. (2004). Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry. J. Manage. Eng., 20(3), 110–117.

Siaudzionis Filho, F. A. B., Pontes, H. L. J., Albertin, M. R., de Lima, R. L. M., & de Castro Moraes, T. (2018). Application of visual management panel on an airplane assembly station. International journal of productivity and performance management (67), 1045 –1062.

Simatupang, T. M. (2004) Benchmarking supply chain collaboration An empirical study. Benchmarking: an International Journal, 11 (5), 484 – 503.

Vogl, B., & Abdel-Wahab, M. (2015) Measuring the Construction Industry’s Productivity Performance: Critique of International Productivity Comparisons at Industry Level. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 141(4), 1-10.

Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, D. W. M. (2008). Establishing quantitative indicators for measuring the partnering performance of construction projects in Hong Kong. Constr. Manage. Econ., 26(3), 277–301.

Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, D. W. M. (2009a). A computerized model for measuring and benchmarking the partnering performance of construction projects. Autom. Constr., 18(8), 1099–1113.

Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, D. W. M. (2009b). Developing a performance index for relationship-based construction projects in Australia: Delphi study. J. Manage. Eng., 25(2), 59–68.

Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., & Li, L. K. (2007). Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: A Delphi study. Constr. Manage. Econ., 25(12), 1219–1237.

Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., Chiang, Y. H., & Yan, H. (2013) Developing a Benchmarking Model for Construction Projects in Hong Kong. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 139(6), 705-716.


1. Associate Professor. Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Federal Univ. of Ceará. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 60440-554. Contact: albertin@ot.ufc.br

2. Associate Professor. Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Federal Univ. of Ceará. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 60440-554. Contact: hjaguaribe@ufc.br

3. Assistant Professor. Federal Univ. of Ceará. Russas, Ceará, Brazil, 62900-000. Contact: dmontier.aragao@ufc.br

4. Associate Professor. Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Federal Univ. of Ceará. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 60440-554. Contact: baprata@ufc.br

5. EBTT Professor. Logistics Coordination, Federal Institute of Alagoas. Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil, 57084-649. Contact: marcos.charles@ifal.edu.br


Revista ESPACIOS
ISSN-L: 0798-1015 |  eISSN: 2739-0071 (En línea)
Vol. 42 (Nº 16) Año 2021

[NDICE]

[WEBMASTER]

Desarrollada por .com

revistaespacios.com

Licencia de Creative Commons
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons
Reconocimiento NoComercial 4.0 Internacional