Principios del DUA y la Orientación Vocacional Profesional: Un estudio correlacional en Educación General Básica

Jaime GONZÁLEZ-SÁNCHEZ; Monica BANGUERA GARCÍA; Rosa MATICURENA MALDONADO; Isabel PALACIOS FLORES

doi:10.48082/espacios-a26v47n02i04

Authors

Jaime GONZÁLEZ-SÁNCHEZ Ministry of Education Author
Monica BANGUERA GARCÍA Ministry of Education Author
Rosa MATICURENA MALDONADO Ministry of Education Author
Isabel PALACIOS FLORES Ministerio de Educación Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a26v47n02i04

Keywords:

Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje, orientación vocacional, autoconocimiento

Abstract

El estudio determinó la relación entre los principios del Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje (DUA) y la Orientación Vocacional y Profesional en estudiantes de Educación General Básica. Se utilizó un diseño correlacional con dos cuestionarios validados aplicados a 84 participantes. Los resultados mostraron asociaciones positivas, especialmente con el autoconocimiento. Se concluye que el DUA favorece procesos clave para la formación vocacional, fortaleciendo la reflexión personal y la toma de decisiones educativas.

References

Ackermans, K., Bakker, M., van Loon, A.-M., Kral, M., & Camp, G. (2025). Young learners’ motivation, self-regulation and performance in personalized learning. Computers & Education, 226, 105208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105208

Arteaga, M., Guaraca, S., Hermenejildo, L., Castro, N., Briones, V., & González-Sánchez, J. (2025). Método DUA: un catalizador del éxito cognitivo en los estudiantes. Espacios, 46(02), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a25v46n02p06

Ausubel, D. (1976). Psicología educativa: Un punto de vista cognoscitivo. Trillas.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.

CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. The UDL Guidelines. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Coll, C., Engel, A., & Niño, S. (2017). La actividad de los participantes como fuente de información para promover la colaboración. Una analítica del aprendizaje basada en el modelo de Influencia Educativa Distribuida. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 53. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/53/2

COPE. (2024). Authorship and AI tools. https://doi.org/10.24318/cCVRZBms

Delors, J. (1996). La educación encierra un tesoro. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000109590_spa

Eyland, T., & Leung, A. (2025). A purpose-driven approach to apply the universal design for learning: A focus on the “why.” International Review of Economics Education, 49, 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2025.100319

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. Basic Books.

Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 14, 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163

Han, C., & Lei, J. (2024). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs towards universal design for learning framework: A scoping review. Sage Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241272032

Immordino-Yang, M., & Gotlieb, R. (2017). Embodied brains, social minds, cultural meaning. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1_suppl), 344S-367S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216669780

Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.

Meyer, A., & Rose, D. (2005). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. In D. H. Rose, A. Meyer, & C. Hitchcock (Eds.), The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies (pp. 13–35). Harvard Education Press.

Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2023). Acuerdo Ministerial No. MINEDUC-MINEDUC-2023-00008-A.

Moore, S. (2007). David H. Rose, Anne Meyer, Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 521–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9056-3

Novak, J. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd ed.). Routledge.

OECD. (2023). Building future-ready vocational education and training systems. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/28551a79-en

Pannullo, L., Böttinger, T., & Winkelmann, J. (2025). Inclusive and digital science education—A theoretical framework for lesson planning. Education Sciences, 15(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020148

Patzak, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Blending teacher autonomy support and provision of structure in the classroom for optimal motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2

Penabad-Camacho, L., Penabad-Camacho, M. A., Mora-Campos, A., Cerdas-Vega, G., Morales-López, Y., Ulate-Segura, M., Méndez-Solano, A., Nova-Bustos, N., Vega-Solano, M., & Castro-Solano, M. (2024). Declaración de Heredia: Principios sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial en la edición científica. Revista Electrónica Educare, 28(S), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.28-S.19967

Rogers, C., & Freiberg, H. (1983). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. ASCD.

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Silva, A., Carvalho, C., Coscioni, V., & Taveira, M. (2023). Future time orientation, life projects, and career self-efficacy of unemployed individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1230851

Veytia, M., Gómez-Galán, J., Cáceres, M., & López, L. (2024). Digital technologies as enablers of universal design for learning: higher education students’ perceptions in the context of SDG4. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00699-0

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

World Medical Association. (2025). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA, 333(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.21972

Wuttke, E., Heinrichs, K., Koegler, K., & Just, A. (2024). How training quality, trainer competence, and satisfaction with training affect vocational identification of apprentices in vocational education programs. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1200279